Cursor vs Bolt.new

Detailed comparison of features, pricing, and use cases

Cursor

Overview

Professional IDE with advanced AI capabilities

Pricing

$20/seat

Model

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Key Features

  • Strong multi-file editing capabilities
  • Advanced agent mode for command generation
  • Auto-commit messages
  • Bug finding capabilities
  • Full IDE integration

Pros

  • Powerful IDE features
  • Advanced AI capabilities
  • Great for professional development
  • Strong multi-file support

Cons

  • Higher price point
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Resource intensive

Best For

Professional developers needing full IDE capabilities

Limitations

Higher price point and system requirements

Bolt.new

Overview

Web-based AI development environment

Pricing

Free community version

Model

Various

Key Features

  • Web-based solution
  • Beginner-friendly
  • Quick deployment
  • Open-source community version
  • Direct preview capabilities

Pros

  • No installation required
  • Easy to get started
  • Free community version
  • Good for prototypes

Cons

  • Limited compared to full IDEs
  • Less customization options
  • Basic feature set

Best For

Quick prototyping and learning

Limitations

Limited customization and advanced features

Video coming soon

Video coming soon

Summary

Cursor is best for professional developers needing full ide capabilities, while Bolt.new excels at quick prototyping and learning. Consider your specific needs and constraints when choosing between them.

No Code Agents Skool Community

Join the No Code Agents Community

Connect with fellow no-code enthusiasts, share insights, and accelerate your journey in building AI-powered solutions without coding.

Ready to transform your business?