Skip to content

Cursor vs CodeGPT

Last updated: October 12, 2025
Cursor logo
8.4/10
WinnerCursor
Overall Score
Try Cursor
VS
CodeGPT logo
5.4/10
CodeGPT
Overall Score
Try CodeGPT

I tested CodeGPT and Cursor to see which AI helper is best for coding. I wanted to know which one could write code faster. I also checked which one helped fix bugs easier. I even looked at how well they understood different coding languages. It was like having two robot assistants helping me code!

I used them on some of my own projects. I tried making a simple game and a website. I wanted to see how well each tool could help. I paid attention to how quickly they gave suggestions. I also looked at how good the suggested code was. Did it actually work, or did it have errors?

CodeGPT works inside your normal coding program. Cursor is a whole new program that looks like VS Code. This made a big difference in how they felt to use. One felt like a helpful add-on. The other felt like a completely new way to code.

In this comparison, you'll learn which tool is faster. You will also see which one gives better code suggestions. Finally, you will learn which one is easier to use for your coding projects. This will help you pick the best AI coding helper for you.

Cursor Overview

Category:AI IDE
Description:

Cursor is an AI-powered code editor built as a fork of Visual Studio Code, designed to enhance developer productivity by integrating advanced artificial intelligence directly into the coding workflow...

Cursor allows users to write, edit, and refactor code using natural language instructions, making it accessible to both experienced developers and beginners.

The tool deeply understands the context of entire codebases, enabling sophisticated code analysis and multi-file edits.

Key features include AI-driven autocomplete, smart code improvement, plain language commands, in-context help, and debugging assistance. Cursor also integrates with Git, supports remote development via SSH, and is compatible with most VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings.

Its agent mode can execute end-to-end coding tasks, and it offers privacy controls such as SOC 2 certification and a Privacy Mode that prevents remote code storage without user consent. Cursor is used by engineers at major tech companies and is positioned as a direct competitor to GitHub Copilot, differentiating itself with its multi-model support, deep codebase understanding, and seamless integration into existing developer workflows..

Pricing Model:Subscription

CodeGPT Overview

Category:AI Code Assistant
Description:

CodeGPT is an AI-powered coding assistant designed to enhance software development productivity by integrating directly into popular integrated development environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio Code and JetBrains...

CodeGPT leverages advanced AI models to understand the context of code, offering relevant and accurate assistance for writing, reviewing, and improving code quality.

The tool supports multiple programming languages and offers customizable AI assistants, allowing users to tailor the assistant to specific coding needs.

CodeGPT is suitable for a wide range of users, including individual developers, software engineers, development teams, coding bootcamp students, and freelancers. Its unique differentiators include seamless IDE integration, customizable AI agents, secure data handling (with data excluded from AI training by default), and flexible deployment options, including self-hosted and bring-your-own-key (BYOK) capabilities.

CodeGPT also provides enterprise-grade security features such as SOC 2 Type II certification and supports team collaboration with features like unlimited team members and organization management. The platform is available as a web-based application and through IDE extensions, making it accessible across different workflows.

Pricing is structured to accommodate various user needs, from a free tier for beginners to advanced business solutions for enterprises.

Pricing Model:Freemium|Subscription|Enterprise|Usage-based

Video Tutorials & Demos

Cursor

Cursor Overview

CodeGPT

Video coming soon

CodeGPT Overview

Live Pricing Pages

Embedded directly from the vendor when allowed. Expect third-party banners or cookie prompts inside the frame.

Live pricing
Open in new tab
Live pricing
Open in new tab

Some providers block embedding their pricing pages. If a box stays blank, use the external link to view the most up-to-date pricing details directly.

Feature Comparison

Most decisive differences first—expand to explore every scored metric.

SecurityCursor +3.8
Cursor7.8
CodeGPT4.0
CollaborationCursor +3.7
Cursor8.2
CodeGPT4.5
Language SupportCursor +3.5
Cursor8.5
CodeGPT5.0
CustomizationCursor +3.3
Cursor8.8
CodeGPT5.5

Strengths & Weaknesses Analysis

Cursor logo

Cursor

Strengths

  • Excellent code generation capabilities
  • Excellent language support capabilities
  • Excellent performance speed capabilities
  • Excellent customization capabilities

Areas for Improvement

  • No free tier available
CodeGPT logo

CodeGPT

Strengths

  • Enterprise-grade features
  • Strong privacy and security

Areas for Improvement

  • Limited language support features
  • Limited team collaboration features
  • Limited security privacy features

Final Verdict

Cursor logo

Cursor Takes the Lead

Overall Winner

Our Recommendation

Cursor is the better choice with a score of 8.2/10. Cursor is much better at writing code - it beats CodeGPT by 2.9 points. Cursor got some big improvements in 2025. These updates make it even better. Cursor can do coding work automatically, which saves you time on big projects. CodeGPT has good points too - it's easy to use and works well for some tasks. But Cursor is the better choice for most teams.

Choose Cursor if:
  • You frequently need to generate code from scratch
  • Data privacy and security are top priorities
  • You need a reliable and well-supported tool
Choose CodeGPT if:
  • You work in an enterprise environment
  • You need a reliable and well-supported tool

Ready to transform your business?