Cursor vs Windsurf

Detailed comparison of features, pricing, and use cases

Cursor

Overview

Professional IDE with advanced AI capabilities

Pricing

$20/seat

Model

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Key Features

  • Strong multi-file editing capabilities
  • Advanced agent mode for command generation
  • Auto-commit messages
  • Bug finding capabilities
  • Full IDE integration

Pros

  • Powerful IDE features
  • Advanced AI capabilities
  • Great for professional development
  • Strong multi-file support

Cons

  • Higher price point
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Resource intensive

Best For

Professional developers needing full IDE capabilities

Limitations

Higher price point and system requirements

Windsurf

Overview

Fast, intuitive AI coding assistant

Pricing

$15/seat

Model

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Key Features

  • Clean, intuitive UI
  • Fast response times
  • Beginner-friendly interface
  • Credit-based system
  • Real-time collaboration

Pros

  • Faster response times
  • More intuitive interface
  • Lower price point
  • Great for beginners

Cons

  • Credit-based pricing model
  • Less advanced features than full IDEs
  • Limited enterprise features

Best For

Developers looking for a fast, intuitive coding assistant

Limitations

Credit-based pricing model may limit heavy usage

Video coming soon

Video coming soon

Summary

Cursor is best for professional developers needing full ide capabilities, while Windsurf excels at developers looking for a fast, intuitive coding assistant. Consider your specific needs and constraints when choosing between them.

No Code Agents Skool Community

Join the No Code Agents Community

Connect with fellow no-code enthusiasts, share insights, and accelerate your journey in building AI-powered solutions without coding.

Ready to transform your business?